Salle de style chinois d'imp?t ? mort pr��coce ? _ il Liang ch��ne Sina Blog

China type robad credit california home loansom tax will "early death" background describes: Chongqing of real estate tax like lunar new year film as, pulled has prelude, its results is comedy also tragedy? has many guessing of version. author in Chongqing levy of first time within on why select Chongqing as pilot of first station for has analysis. While on inflation and protection room governance should as now important and emergency of events to treat, tax of problem should placed in important but does not emergency to processing. tax problem is national, its caused of dispute is all holds its words. opposition main views is in China residential land nature, actual is buy has 70 years right, this does not private situation Xia also to levy tax, Government is trying to increased tax; and in favour of sent is for land financial dependency considering, increasing so of taxes can mitigation local financial on landInjury attorney los angeles transfer gold rely on, a small but steady stream any Grains of sand can be grouped together to form a pagoda. get stable any large gains, on structural adjustment and system perfect up to active promote role. in favour of sent and opposition from author angle view, is contradictions of parallel body, no intersection part, so conclusions solid different. its important contradictions points on is opposition made of "incentives" is not "good due to"; and in favour of sent concern of is "good fruit" didn't considering its "variable fruit". opposition from "incentives" in the read out has "non-good" factor, is in grievances and resentment in the longitudinal comparison other States land private ownership degrees of thoroughly of while public service protection system sound. and in China has both does not private does to collection, socialbmg music services security system of serious missing. in favour of sent of "good fruit" from Yu idealized has the tax can from land dependency in the free out, so in land system perfect and public welfare sound aspects to force. below we can see about other States tax and welfare how balance situation, may can find contradictions continuum and non-China type "contradictions" parallel body United States currently, United States 50 a State are has levy real estate tax, rates General for 1% to 3%, from 2000 to 2007, due to United States medium price room of prices growth has 48%, United States real estate tax corresponding to in over has has 62% of increases. Il est entendu que les ��tats-Unis estate 70 % pour les districts scolaires �� payer l'enseignement obligatoire, d'am��liorer la Loi et l'ordre et des environnements publics, permettant aux districts scolaires autour de l'am��lioration de l'environnement, d'imp?t et de house prix appr��ciation de la nature. Dans la plupart des citoyens des ��tats-Unis, enfants peuvent profiter apr��s avoir pay�� la taxe sur les biens immobiliers pour une douzaine d'ann��es de l'enseignement obligatoire, ils sont pr��ts �� payer des imp?ts. Cela refl��te pleinement la philosophie de ? provient du peuple, par le peuple ? de taxe. Allemagne Allemagne prendre pour gagner sa vie et les exigences de la rigidit�� important de biens immobiliers. Le pass�� 10 ans, le prix nominal de l'immobilier ont augment�� de seulement 1 % par an de l'Allemagne, mais le prix Allemagne une moyenne annuelle augmenter de 2 %, ce qui signifie qu'en termes r��els, Allemagne prix r��tr��ci en fait �� un taux annuel de 1 %. Augmenteront les prix de l'immobilier de l'Allemagne depuis 10 ans, m��me pendant la crise financi��re continue tendance stable. Parce que l'Allemagne un contr?le strict de l'hyper-l'inflation, une fois l'IPC d��passe les normes, Banque centrale de l'Allemagne va augmenter les taux d'int��r��t. Ainsi, Allemagne ne produira pas effet de bulles de monnaie bubble-prix des actifs. Singapour Singapour adh��re aux principes de petit-, bas prix et des maisons, des all��gements fiscaux pour acheter leur propre maison, sur les 10 % des groupes plus d��favoris��s, le gouvernement fournit des subventions ou des logements �� prix abordable. Gouvernement contr?le strictement la proportion ��lev��e de maisons commerciales, pour plus de 100 m��tres carr��s de ? l'homme riche House ?, en charge de loyer ��lev�� de terre et de la propri��t�� des frais ��lev��s. Singapour de taxe fonci��re est calcul��e selon la valeur de la production annuelle de la maison, et la production annuelle est nette revenu peut ��tre gagn�� chaque ann��e loyer du logement, qui est l'annuelle louer moins la propri��t��, les meubles, les frais d'entretien. Imp?t sur les biens immobiliers, le gouvernement incarne ��galement le principe de ? Voler les riches pour nourrir les pauvres ?: occup��s par leur propri��taire immobilier immobilier taux de la taxe a ��t�� de 4 %, d'autres types de taux d'imp?t immobilier ��tait de 10 %. Pour les propri��taires de petites, remise �� la 4 % sur la base du gouvernement. �� partir de 2011, le gouvernement de la r��forme de l'imp?t sur les biens, plus enclin aux groupes vuln��rables. from above three a national situation view, regardless of is size vast of United States also is City State economic of Singapore or high-tech economic body developed of Germany, tax of using Shang and overall structure of provisioning in the are target clear, implementation in place up effect striking. If earlier years in land transfer gold in the extraction protection room construction funds in place, social welfare system more perfect, also does not as in funds go problem Shang attracted mass complained about. plus in China each regional real estate development situation does not as, different version will difference larger, collection real estate tax of object does not clear--involved to has interests groups itself. Although real estate tax of boots certainly will falls, but this process is may is "points kill" not (high order goods room or more sets has who), speech becomes "group kill" (for the relief of or shouldn't collection of also levy), caused grievances rose. If the tax levy target does not clear, combat points does not in place or received of funds in using nature Shang does not transparent, both cannot out on land revenue rely on, also promote can't land system reform and welfare system perfect, is may pilot in the on will mortality.